<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Competitive Intelligence 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bettercloser.com/competitive-intelligence-2-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bettercloser.com/competitive-intelligence-2-0/</link>
	<description>Bill Rice on Internet Marketing, Social Selling</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 06:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: RSS, Competitive Intelligence 2.0 Plumbing &#124; Better Closer</title>
		<link>http://bettercloser.com/competitive-intelligence-2-0/#comment-1649</link>
		<dc:creator>RSS, Competitive Intelligence 2.0 Plumbing &#124; Better Closer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bettercloser.com/?p=602#comment-1649</guid>
		<description>[...] the other day I wrote about a simple framework to discuss how competitive intelligence is evolving. But, I sort of neglected to talk about what is bringing this virtual flood of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the other day I wrote about a simple framework to discuss how competitive intelligence is evolving. But, I sort of neglected to talk about what is bringing this virtual flood of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by CompassNorthInc</title>
		<link>http://bettercloser.com/competitive-intelligence-2-0/#comment-1644</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by CompassNorthInc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bettercloser.com/?p=602#comment-1644</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by CompassNorthInc [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by CompassNorthInc [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by JohnFMoore</title>
		<link>http://bettercloser.com/competitive-intelligence-2-0/#comment-1643</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by JohnFMoore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bettercloser.com/?p=602#comment-1643</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by JohnFMoore [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by JohnFMoore [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Rice</title>
		<link>http://bettercloser.com/competitive-intelligence-2-0/#comment-2023</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bettercloser.com/?p=602#comment-2023</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that customizing for each client is critical. No one is going to know their business, industry, and relevance of the information better than they will. When I was in the intelligence business we had &quot;area experts&quot; that trained for years to understand the nuances of language, culture, politics, and environment. Unfortunately, the private sector doesn&#039;t have the resources to replicate that model and offer an afford price--so we rely on close collaboration with the customer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I depart with you significantly on vetting the sources though. It is critical to understand the credibility, access, and motivations of many of your sources. It will prevent you from serving up information that makes you look incompetent or waste your client&#039;s time and resources. Even worse sending them down a strategic path based on a competitors deception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that customizing for each client is critical. No one is going to know their business, industry, and relevance of the information better than they will. When I was in the intelligence business we had &#8220;area experts&#8221; that trained for years to understand the nuances of language, culture, politics, and environment. Unfortunately, the private sector doesn&#39;t have the resources to replicate that model and offer an afford price&#8211;so we rely on close collaboration with the customer.</p>
<p>I depart with you significantly on vetting the sources though. It is critical to understand the credibility, access, and motivations of many of your sources. It will prevent you from serving up information that makes you look incompetent or waste your client&#39;s time and resources. Even worse sending them down a strategic path based on a competitors deception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Rice</title>
		<link>http://bettercloser.com/competitive-intelligence-2-0/#comment-1846</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 11:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bettercloser.com/?p=602#comment-1846</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that customizing for each client is critical. No one is going to know their business, industry, and relevance of the information better than they will. When I was in the intelligence business we had &quot;area experts&quot; that trained for years to understand the nuances of language, culture, politics, and environment. Unfortunately, the private sector doesn&#039;t have the resources to replicate that model and offer an afford price--so we rely on close collaboration with the customer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I depart with you significantly on vetting the sources though. It is critical to understand the credibility, access, and motivations of many of your sources. It will prevent you from serving up information that makes you look incompetent or waste your client&#039;s time and resources. Even worse sending them down a strategic path based on a competitors deception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that customizing for each client is critical. No one is going to know their business, industry, and relevance of the information better than they will. When I was in the intelligence business we had &#8220;area experts&#8221; that trained for years to understand the nuances of language, culture, politics, and environment. Unfortunately, the private sector doesn&#39;t have the resources to replicate that model and offer an afford price&#8211;so we rely on close collaboration with the customer.</p>
<p>I depart with you significantly on vetting the sources though. It is critical to understand the credibility, access, and motivations of many of your sources. It will prevent you from serving up information that makes you look incompetent or waste your client&#39;s time and resources. Even worse sending them down a strategic path based on a competitors deception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Rice</title>
		<link>http://bettercloser.com/competitive-intelligence-2-0/#comment-1641</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bettercloser.com/?p=602#comment-1641</guid>
		<description>I agree with you that customizing for each client is critical. No one is going to know their business, industry, and relevance of the information better than they will. When I was in the intelligence business we had &quot;area experts&quot; that trained for years to understand the nuances of language, culture, politics, and environment. Unfortunately, the private sector doesn&#039;t have the resources to replicate that model and offer an afford price--so we rely on close collaboration with the customer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I depart with you significantly on vetting the sources though. It is critical to understand the credibility, access, and motivations of many of your sources. It will prevent you from serving up information that makes you look incompetent or waste your client&#039;s time and resources. Even worse sending them down a strategic path based on a competitors deception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you that customizing for each client is critical. No one is going to know their business, industry, and relevance of the information better than they will. When I was in the intelligence business we had &#8220;area experts&#8221; that trained for years to understand the nuances of language, culture, politics, and environment. Unfortunately, the private sector doesn&#39;t have the resources to replicate that model and offer an afford price&#8211;so we rely on close collaboration with the customer.</p>
<p>I depart with you significantly on vetting the sources though. It is critical to understand the credibility, access, and motivations of many of your sources. It will prevent you from serving up information that makes you look incompetent or waste your client&#39;s time and resources. Even worse sending them down a strategic path based on a competitors deception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivek Sharma</title>
		<link>http://bettercloser.com/competitive-intelligence-2-0/#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivek Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bettercloser.com/?p=602#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>Bill,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting article. I can agree that sifting information for significance can be of little more advantage than ignoring the source.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I still feel searching the web for CI is akin to exploring new lands on a map. Vetting would just improve the appearance of the map.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At Connotia, we find the success is achieved by customizing the solutions for clients. Simply put - Ask what questions need to be answered, seek not only available data but also missing pieces of information, and then sift the relevant from irrelevant. I always try to remember the story of six blind men and the elephant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>Interesting article. I can agree that sifting information for significance can be of little more advantage than ignoring the source.</p>
<p>I still feel searching the web for CI is akin to exploring new lands on a map. Vetting would just improve the appearance of the map.</p>
<p>At Connotia, we find the success is achieved by customizing the solutions for clients. Simply put &#8211; Ask what questions need to be answered, seek not only available data but also missing pieces of information, and then sift the relevant from irrelevant. I always try to remember the story of six blind men and the elephant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by shanegibson</title>
		<link>http://bettercloser.com/competitive-intelligence-2-0/#comment-1639</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by shanegibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bettercloser.com/?p=602#comment-1639</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by shanegibson [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by shanegibson [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://bettercloser.com/competitive-intelligence-2-0/#comment-1638</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bettercloser.com/?p=602#comment-1638</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by LeadBuyer: BetterCloser: Competitive Intelligence 2.0: 
Image via Wikipedia

Whether you are in corporate strategy, mark... http://tinyurl.com/yl3xbh7...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by LeadBuyer: BetterCloser: Competitive Intelligence 2.0:<br />
Image via Wikipedia</p>
<p>Whether you are in corporate strategy, mark&#8230; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yl3xbh7.." rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yl3xbh7..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: S3: bettercloser.s3.amazonaws.com

Served from: bettercloser.com @ 2012-02-08 16:41:11 -->
